Email
Conducting and Related Subjects
Refocusing the Debate on Beethoven's Metronome Marks
by Yoichi Udagawa
There has always been great debate about the metronome marks in Beethoven
Symphonies. Performer "A" believes that the speeds indicated
make the music sound "un-Beethovenian", while Performer "B"
thinks that some of the marks are good while others are suspect. The debate
about Beethoven's marks center around their validity and rarely involve
any discussion as to the reasons Beethoven chose the marks that he did.
If the debate about Beethoven's MM were to revolve around trying to understand
Beethoven's choices instead of questioning them, the debate might lead
to interesting insights. What was Beethoven trying to say in making his
choices of MM? Are the choices arbitrary or do they have some rational
basis? If so, what are they? How are the choice of MM related to the composition?
Assumption 1: Tempo clarifies musical structure and form. Musical structures
and forms unfold through time, and tempo determines the speed with which
this happens. A composer is challenged with the task of organizing musical
elements into a complete work. All these elements must be presented at
a tempo which enables the listener to hear the composition as a coherent
whole.
Assumption 2: The metronome marks can be best understood as attempts to
choose tempi that best clarify all the compositional elements of a piece.
This includes large scale formal designs, phrase lengths, meter, tempo
indicators, and even such details as bowings and dynamic marks.
Thesis: The metronome marks left by Beethoven are decisions about tempi
that are inseparable from all the elements of his compositions. The composition
determines the tempo and the tempo in turn determines whether a listener
will be able to hear all the details of a piece that Beethoven meant to
be heard. The metronome marks are as integral to the composition as the
key signatures or the notes themselves. They are his insights about how
his music can be best understood.
There are many examples of movements from Beethoven Symphonies which are
often performed at tempi which differ vastly from Beethoven's MM. The
second mvt. from the fourth symphony is a good example. It is often taken
at a tempo that is much slower then the one indicated by the MM. Analyzing
the movements compositional elements will reveal that there are many reasons
to support Beethoven's choice of MM. The second mvt of the fourth symphony
is in sonata form, and the phrases are generally 8 bars (4+4) in length.
The relationship between form and phrase lengths with tempo is simple.
The tempo must be a speed which enables the listener to discern the phrase
structure as a whole. If that is accomplished, the listener will be able
to hear the overall formal structure of the composition. If the tempo
is too quick, the phrases sound compressed, and if the tempo is too slow,
the listener will not be able to comprehend the phrase as a whole. The
first phrase is 8 bars (4+4) long. This can be confirmed by observing
that the phrase is repeated immediately thereafter in a varied form. The
recapitulation at measure 64 is also 8 bars in length.
The development beginning at measure 41 starts with an 8 bar statement
of the first theme. This analysis confirms the phrase lengths as being
8 bars. The tempo chosen should be such that the listener can hear this
8 bar phrase as a whole. In most performances, the tempo is quite a bit
slower than Beethoven's marking of e = 84. The tempos generally are around
e = 50. At this speed, it becomes almost impossible for the listener to
hear the first 8 bar phrase as a whole. The phrase gets broken up into
smaller 1 or 2 bar segments. At Beethoven's tempo, it becomes easy to
hear all the 8 bar phrases as whole entities. This allows the listener
to clearly hear the phrases and how they connect within the larger formal
structures of the movement. Whatever our subjective feelings about Beethoven's
choice of MM might be, his "fast" tempo was chosen because it
best clarifies his phrase and formal structures.
The meter of the second movement is 3/4 and the tempo indication is Adagio.
Let us assume that the meter should be felt as a slow 3/4. Beethoven's
MM of e = 84 translates into a slow quarter q = 42. At that speed, one
can still hear the meter as being a slow 3/4. Most modern day conductors
take a tempo around e = 50. At this tempo, it becomes almost impossible
to hear the pulse as a quarter note. Invariably, most listeners hear the
eighth note as the beat. In addition, the 3/4 meter breaks down, and the
music sounds like it is in 6/8 or 2/8. The ironic thing about this is
that the slower tempo of an e = 53 can be heard as being faster than the
q = 42. This can be explained as a question of what the listener perceives
the beat to be. At e = 50, the listener hears the pulse in eighth notes.
At q = 42, the listener feels the pulse in quarter notes. The perception
is that the faster tempo is "slower" than the slow tempo. The
meter and the tempo indication of Adagio can both be accounted for by
Beethoven's choice of MM. At the speed of e = 84 which translates to q
= 42, the sense of the 3/4 meter is preserved and the listener hears the
quarter note pulse as being Adagio.
The bowing marks (the slurs) in the string parts are worth examination.
The traditional approach to bowings is to interpret them as only phrase
indicators and not as literal bowings. Furthermore, the slow tempos taken
by most conductors today make it almost impossible to play them. However,
if one takes Beethoven's MM, his bowings make sense as bowings. For example,
the first violins enter at bar 2. The bowing slurs across the entire first
bar. The dynamic indication is piano. At Beethoven's MM, the bowing is
entirely possible, and it has the added advantage of insuring that the
violins will play piano. The cellos enter at bar 2 and have a two bar
slur. This too makes sense with Beethoven's MM and insures a soft dynamic.
Moving on to bar 5, the first violins have a crescendo. With Beethoven's
bowings, the players will naturally use more bow and make the crescendo.
Bars 6&7 are once more piano and the crescendo in bar 8 is accompanied
by a bowing that easily enables the players to make more sound. The bowings
left by Beethoven are possible and logical when the tempo is q = 42 (e
= 84). This is not the case when the tempos taken are the traditional
ones which are around e = 50. At that tempo, the bowings are impossible.
Furthermore, they become thought of as "phrase marks" which
they are not. The phrases are not 1 bar segments but are 8 bars long.
The controversy about Beethoven's metronome markings are characterized
by arguments about their validity and not at all about what might have
lead Beethoven to make the choices that he did. Most of those who are
critical of Beethoven's judgment regarding his choice of tempos nevertheless
hold him up as one of the giants of Western music. How is it that a great
composer cannot be given the benefit of the doubt concerning something
as basic a picking a tempo? The debate should not be about the legitimacy
of the metronome marks, but rather about the reasons that would explain
why he chose the tempos that he did. This way of approaching Beethoven's
metronome marks will reveal that Beethoven's choices of MM's are related
to all aspects of his compositions. The form and structure, the meter,
tempo indications, bowings, and dynamic marks, should all be revealed
to us in performance. The choice of tempo is crucial to insuring that
the listener can hear all the component parts of a piece as a unity. Beethoven's
metronome marks serve that function.
Conducting and Related Subjects
© Yoichi Udagawa